Standards - Part 5 - What's a click? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Whizzbang   
Tuesday, 29 January 2008

Late last year I began a series on transparency, mapping out a direction for how to achieve a level of transparency that has so far been out of the reach of domainers. The first step in this journey is the forming of a series of standards that the various parking companies and advertising aggregators such as Google and Yahoo can be measured against.

mouseThe first proposed standard was traffic and exactly what is a unique and how can we be sure that we have a unique visitor to a parked page. This was discussed in a previous article. This article will tackle the challenges associated with a definition of a click.

On the surface a click should be quite obvious. Either a user has clicked or they haven't and both of these events are technically very easy to measure. The challenge comes when you tie a click to a payment.

As soon as a payment is associated with a click then the lure of the potential rewards associated with clicking on your own advertisements becomes irresistible to some people. In fact, why click on your own advertisement when you can write a program to do it for you? This fraudulent behavior is one of the many reasons why we now have so many definitions of a click.

One of the most common methods of trying to address the fraud problem is by limiting the number of clicks that can be received from a unique IP address for a period of time.

For example, this could mean that when a domain receives two clicks from a single IP address within thirty minutes of each other then only one click is counted. In the case of some parking companies they only count a single click per 18-24 hour period!

In a question and answer times at TRAFFIC in 2006 I publicly asked the representative from Google, "Do you pay for EVERY click?" He answered unequivocally, "Yes".

I then proposed the scenario of a user going to a parked page, click on an advertisement and then clicking the back button in their browser and clicking on another advertisement. I asked, "How many clicks does the owner of the domain get paid for?" The representative from Google answered, "Two clicks". I then thanked him and began thinking in earnest about that second click. Where did it go and why did it go?

Have you ever noticed that it's impossible to get over 100% click through rate with most parking companies? This is because it's likely that the second click is swallowed by the anti-fraud systems. If the click is swallowed then is the payment for the click swallowed as well? There really was only one way to find out.

I posed the same questions that I asked the Google representative to a parking company using the Google advertising feed. They answered that the click is not counted but the payment for both clicks are added together and reported for the domain.

In the interests of good blogging I had to test this answer. I had a friend go to a domain (with a "clean IP address"), click an advertising link, the back button and then on another advertisement. (It is important to note that under my agreement with the parking company that I'm allowed to test pages out for a number of clicks per month.)The system reported one click and the minimum earnings per click payable, not twice the minimum. This is a problem.

In my next article I'd like to explore why I think that many parking companies swallow the second click and it's not because they are necessarily stealing from you. Let's face it, any parking company that actively stole from domainers would be exposed as soon as an employee left. I also believe that sometimes stuff just happens and this needs to be addressed.

Previous articles in the series:
Part 1 - Parking Company Standards
Part 2 - The journey to transparency
Part 3 - Traffic definitions and reporting
Part 4 - Current Traffic Reporting Problems

Trackback(0)
Comments (5)Add Comment
...
written by btothec, 31 January 2008
I hate to bust your balls, but I doubt very much that you were given the OK to click on any ads. No parking company would tell you this is ok to do. On top of it being illegal, they would know that you would be able to calculate how much of the revenue they were keeping.

I had a friend go to a domain (with a "clean IP address")


What was his IP "Clean" from? How can this parking company know not to change google or yahoo for these clicks if he used his "Clean IP"?

I know it was just a couple clicks but that is how it always starts. And you really should make a note on your blog when you edit something. That way people know what the comments are referring to.

smilies/smiley.gif

I am always giving you a hard time huh?
Great Article!!
written by Sean Stafford, 30 January 2008
Michael,

Excellent job. This kind of stuff should be known by every domainer in order to keep things as seemless as possible.

Thanks for the read!

Sean
Click Fraud?
written by Whizzbang, 30 January 2008
I actually have permission from the parking company that was tested in this example to do up to 20 clicks per month for testing purposes. I reality I actually do 1-2 (if that).
This brings up an important point.....never click on your own links without permission from the parking company you are dealing with.
In the example that I did I knew the minimum payout per click therefore I knew that the parking company in question did not pay for both clicks hence I could do the logical leap in the article. I'm sorry that this wasn't very clear....

Thanks for your great feedback!

Dale, if you really received 12885 clicks from Active Audience on a domain that may I suggest that you contact them straight away and have the domain investigated. It could be that there are some anomalies around your domain that is triggering off issues in the their fraud system.
As I remember it .....
written by btothec, 30 January 2008
You didn't ask them if they paid for every click, you asked them why they didn't, insinuating that they only paid for one click. Just wanted to make sure that in the fight for transparency we keep all the facts straight. smilies/tongue.gif

Also I just thought that I would mention that every parking company and every domainer, and every feed provider would consider what you did in the second to last paragraph of this article as click fraud. Just thought that you might want to know. Shame on you! smilies/smiley.gif
Parking companies taking advantage of the domainers.
written by Dale, 30 January 2008
The other day I had 12,685 click throughs with ActiveAudience.com but I was only paid US $1.20 I have to think that they are stealing me blind and so it is time to move my domains to a different company.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Connecting...

Latest Forum Posts